Speaker summary
53%6 analyzed articles/videos51 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nature results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 83.5% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 168 faulty-reasoning hits from 51 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 61.5% and a BS Rank of 76% (6,895 of 28,364 speakers). This Nature is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Nature
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
61.5% BS Score6 analyzed videos51 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 83.5%83.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.5%50.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.5%50.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 83.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.5%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate