Speaker summary
58% 4 analyzed articles/videos 185.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nadav Weiman results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 92 hits . Analysis detected 417.589 faulty-reasoning hits from 185.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,519 of 28,364 speakers). This Nadav Weiman is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Nadav Weiman
Speaker details
Total words: 185.667
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 14.2% BS Score4 analyzed videos185.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 39.6% 39.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 40.7% 40.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 18.1% 18.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 11.5% 11.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 11.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst