US congressman says ‘IDF is lying’ about his detention by settlers and soldiers 12%

By Robert Mackey34%

7/12/2026, 8:25:43 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 145 hits. Analysis detected 597 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 29% and a BS Rank of 12% (18,665 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 88.10% of the article peer group.

Armed Israeli settlers were seen blocking the convoy of a visiting US congressman, Ro Khanna, in an image provided by another member of the delegation, Cameron Kasky. 
Photograph: Cameron Kasky/AP 
US congressman says ‘IDF is lying’ about his detention by settlers and soldiers 
Israeli ambassador to US accuses Ro Khanna of political stunt to distract from support for Graham Platner 
Ro Khanna accused the Israeli government and military of “lying” on Sunday about the US congressman’s detention by armed settlers and Israeli soldiers during a recent visit to the Israeli-occupied West Bank. 
Khanna  a California Democrat  had posted video evidence on social media of Israeli settlers and soldiers blocking the path of his convoy on Wednesday in the South Hebron hills, near the village of Zanuta, where Israelis have driven Palestinians from their homes in what Amnesty International calls a government-backed “ethnic cleansing campaign”. 
During an interview with NBC News  Meet the Press on Sunday, the California Democrat was asked about the Israeli military’s claim that its soldiers “quickly dispersed” the Israeli civilians and reopened the blocked road. 
“The IDF is lying,” Khanna said, referring to the Israel Defense Forces. 
“What happened was unprecedented. 
They had violent settlers detain American citizens, including an American government official. 
You had these settlers brandishing M4 [rifles], kicking the tires of our van, laughing at us, mocking at us, videotaping us. 
“We were detained for about 20 minutes, fearful of our lives. 
Then the IDF comes, four soldiers. 
They tell our translator that they’re on the side of the settlers. 
They further detain us and block us in.” 
Khanna was also asked about comments by Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu , who appeared before him on Meet the Press and called the armed settlers who stopped the congressman’s vehicle as a small band of “juvenile delinquents”. 
Netanyahu maintained they are not part of what he called the “law-abiding” community of Israeli settlers. 
Every Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank , including East Jerusalem, is illegal under international law. 
“I heard the prime minister, and he said Israel is a country of law and order,” Khanna replied. 
“Let me be very specific: the prime minister needs to open an investigation on these violent settlers who are connected to Yinon Levi, who has destroyed Zanuta’s village and is a known person who has killed Palestinians,” Khanna added, invoking the name of an Israeli settler who was recorded on video about a year earlier firing what appeared to be a fatal shot that killed a Palestinian activist, Awdah Hathaleen, in the same region. 
Despite video evidence, including images filmed by Hathaleen himself as he was shot, Levi was not prosecuted by Israeli authorities for the killing. 
Israeli settler violence aimed at driving Palestinians in the region from their homes was the subject of the Oscar-winning documentary No Other Land, which Hathaleen had worked on. 
Netanyahu “needs to have an investigation on these four IDF officers,” Khanna added. 
“Security cameras can see that they were involved in the detention of American citizens. 
How dare they mistreat people with an American passport that way?” 
Israeli officials responded to Khanna’s detention by claiming that he had rejected their effort to shape his visit to the region by adding a meeting with former Israeli hostages held in Gaza after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack. 
They told the New York Post : “Congressman Khanna didn’t come to understand the situation  he came looking for a headline.” 
Khanna responded on social media: “The Israeli government is lying to cover up for 4 IDF soldiers who aided violent settlers. 
“I have met with Israeli hostages and condemned the brutal, terrorist attacks of Oct 7. 
That does [not] excuse the IDF from detaining American citizens.” 
In an interview on Sunday on CBS News’ Face the Nation, Israel’s US-born ambassador to the US, Michael Leiter, accused Khanna of visiting the West Bank as a political stunt  both to distract from his past support of Graham Platner , the former Maine US Senate candidate accused of sexual assault, and to promote his potential run for the White House in 2028. 
Leiter first complained that Khanna had shunned the Israeli government’s effort to help plan his trip, choosing instead to work with dissident groups like Breaking the Silence, an Israeli human rights group founded by former Israeli soldiers who oppose Israel’s six-decade occupation of Palestinian territories seized in 1967. 
He then suggested that the timing of Khanna’s visit and revelation of his detention was suspicious. 
“To have this incident on Wednesday and wait to release it on Saturday, maybe this had more something to do with his support of Graham Platner beforehand and the difficulties he had with that, and trying to shift the focus to something else,” Leiter said. 
The ambassador’s theory that Khanna went to the West Bank to shift attention away from Platner elicited an audible laugh from Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan. 
After Brennan interjected to say that Khanna had asked for the news to be held until after he left Israeli-controlled territory, Leiter further accused the congressman of making the visit to appeal to Democratic voters in the US. 
Khanna had previously cautioned Israelis against detaining “long-shot presidential candidates”. 
“It’s kind of interesting that somebody wants to declare a presidential run by running off to Israel,” the Pennsylvania-born Leiter said. 
“Not strange?” 
Khanna’s account of what happened was supported by Nadav Weiman, the director of Breaking the Silence, who accompanied him. 
“Armed settlers were the first to arrive, and then, as has become the norm, Israeli soldiers joined them,” Weiman wrote on social media. 
“Together they detained the delegation for over an hour. 
The IDF is lying and not for the first time. 
“I went to speak with the soldiers to ask them to use their authority to remove the settlers who had threatened us and blocked the road. 
Instead, [I] saw how the settlers were giving the orders not the other way around.” 
The incident was documented on social media by Khanna’s aide, Cameron Kasky, a Parkland school shooting survivor who works on digital strategy for the congressman. 
Kasky has been credited with using the hashtag #NeverAgain to call for an end to school shootings in the aftermath of that deadly attack, repurposing a slogan linked to Holocaust commemoration. 
“I am always surprised when people ask me why I focus so much on Palestine,” Kasky wrote last year. 
“Beyond my Jewish identity making me strongly opposed to genocide, I’m a school shooting survivor-turned-activist. 
I started my adult life demanding an end to American-made weapons slaughtering children.” 
Explore more on these topics 
Middle East and north Africa 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 3.7%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 2.4%the Guardian: 3.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.4%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.4%This article: 6.3%Robert Mackey: 6.2%the Guardian: 6.1%Framing Effect6.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.7%the Guardian: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 2.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Robert Mackey: 7.4%the Guardian: 10.4%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 1.3%Robert Mackey: 1.2%the Guardian: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias1.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Robert Mackey: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.3%In-Group Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.3%the Guardian: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 3.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 12.9%Robert Mackey: 2.7%the Guardian: 2.0%Ad Hominem12.9%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.3%Robert Mackey: 2.7%the Guardian: 3.8%Appeal to Authority7.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.3%the Guardian: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.5%Robert Mackey: 3.1%the Guardian: 6.3%Hasty Generalization9.5%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.2%the Guardian: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.4%the Guardian: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.1%Robert Mackey: 4.4%the Guardian: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.4%the Guardian: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.5%the Guardian: 2.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.1%the Guardian: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.6%the Guardian: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.3%the Guardian: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.5%the Guardian: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 2.0%the Guardian: 1.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Robert Mackey: 0.6%the Guardian: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 4.3%the Guardian: 10.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.8%the Guardian: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 3.4%the Guardian: 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 1.5%the Guardian: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Robert Mackey: 0.0%the Guardian: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1125 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers41%attributed speech665writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 4 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 6 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 74 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRo Khanna • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 64 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Leiter • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Leiter • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMichael Leiter • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageNadav Weiman • 23 words • 0.0% coverageNadav Weiman • 9 words • 0.0% coverageNadav Weiman • 10 words • 0.0% coverageNadav Weiman • 26 words • 0.0% coverageNadav Weiman • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageCameron Kasky • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCameron Kasky • 15 words • 0.0% coverageCameron Kasky • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Michael Leiter

97%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words15% of attributed speech41% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Michael Leiter: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.