Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos87.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Muyu Xu results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 43.3% saturation with 47.803 hits. Analysis detected 161.803 faulty-reasoning hits from 87.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (12,329 of 26,480 speakers). This Muyu Xu is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Muyu Xu
Speaker details
Total words: 87.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
35.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos87.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 43.3%43.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.7%41.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 43.3%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos