Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video668 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mona Sloane results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 115.57 hits. Analysis detected 688.231 faulty-reasoning hits from 668 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (27,223 of 28,364 speakers). This Mona Sloane is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Mona Sloane
Speaker details
Total words: 668
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.0% percentile
6.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos668 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.5%10.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos