Speaker summary
43% 14 analyzed articles/videos 508 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 110 hits . Analysis detected 749.643 faulty-reasoning hits from 508 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (26,197 of 26,862 speakers). This Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf
Speaker details
Total words: 508
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.9% BS Score14 analyzed videos508 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst