US attacks Iran over ship being hit in Strait of Hormuz 39%

By Associated Press60%

7/12/2026, 4:13:01 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 226 hits. Analysis detected 1,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,138 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.6% and a BS Rank of 39% (13,393 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the article peer group.

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP)  The United States attacked Iran early Sunday morning over an Iranian strike on a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz that set the container ship ablaze and forced its crew to abandon it. 
Iran apparently responded with attacks targeting Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. 
The strait has become the key sticking point in any further negotiations between Iran and the United States to reach a permanent end to the war that began on Feb. 
28. 
About a fifth of all traded oil and natural gas passed through the strait before the war began. 
Iran’s grip on it during the war led to a global energy crisis, though oil prices have sharply dropped since wartime highs of $120 a barrel. 
The U.S. military’s Central Command said it hit some 140 targets in the strikes, far more than the last two rounds, and went after missile and drone launch sites, ammunition dumps, communication equipment and other sites. 
The attacks “degrade Iran’s ability to attack civilian mariners and commercial vessels freely transiting the strait,” it said. 
The new crossfire in the Persian Gulf comes days after U.S. 
President Donald Trump suggested an interim deal in the Iran war was “over.” 
U.S. 
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote online: “Iran made a poor choice. 
Now they pay.” 
Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, the speaker of Iran’s parliament and a main negotiator, responded. 
“The era of one-sided deals is OVER,” he wrote on X. 
“We told you: keep your word or pay the price. 
Reality is knocking.” 
The U.S. launched three rounds of airstrikes targeting Iran in the last week over Iranian attacks on ships heading through the Strait of Hormuz using a route seeking to avoid the Islamic Republic’s territorial waters. 
Tehran retaliated by attacking nations in the region hosting U.S. military forces, while insisting it alone must control the strait and potentially charge vessels for traveling through it. 
Missile alerts sounded across several Gulf Arab nations. 
Qatar’s military said in a statement it intercepted incoming Iranian fire, with explosions heard in neighboring United Arab Emirates. 
Three people, including a child, were wounded as a result of falling shrapnel from the interception of Iranian attacks, Qatar’s Interior Ministry said. 
Meanwhile, missile alerts sounded for the third time on Sunday in Bahrain, an island kingdom in the Persian Gulf home to the U.S. 
Navy’s 5th Fleet. 
Kuwait’s military also said it was intercepting incoming fire. 
Meanwhile, the Omani state news agency said drones struck sites in northeastern Oman. 
Iran had previously claimed attacks on Oman, which the sultanate did not acknowledge. 
The attack came after the two countries held talks on Saturday. 
It wasn’t immediately clear what locations were under attack in the UAE, which so far hadn’t been targeted in the latest round of attacks by Iran. 
The latest attack on the Emirates, home to Abu Dhabi and Dubai, came in May when a drone sparked a fire on the edge of the country’s sole nuclear power plant. 
Iran also made a series of claims about attacks elsewhere that were not immediately confirmed. 
In the Strait of Hormuz attack, a Cyprus-flagged container ship was hit by Iran and suffered “significant engineroom damage” and a civilian crew member is missing, U.S. 
Central Command said early Sunday morning. 
The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center, overseen by the British military, said the ship had been traveling on a route hugging the shoreline of Oman. 
That’s been the way ships have entered and exited the Persian Gulf while avoiding Iranian territorial waters. 
The ship’s crew abandoned the vessel as it was ablaze, the center said. 
Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard said multiple vessels “disregarded our warnings and instructions to correct their course and proceed along the approved route.” 
One of them “was struck by a warning shot and brought to a stop.” 
Iran said that the strait would remain closed “until further notice” and said it would consider targeting “additional enemy bases in the region” if it faced more attacks. 
Iranian state media reported U.S. strikes across swathes of the entire country, including southern Iran in the province closest to the Strait of Hormuz, and military sites in a province near Tehran. 
The latest violence followed Iran and Oman’s foreign ministers meeting on Saturday to discuss the strait, after days of Iranian attacks on ships and U.S. retaliation that dealt a blow to the interim deal to end the war. 
The narrow strait sits in both Iran and Oman’s territorial waters, but has long been considered an international waterway. 
Oman said it and Iran agreed to continue discussing the Strait of Hormuz “at the technical and political levels.” 
However, Iran offered no statement about the strait being open to all  something sought by the Trump administration. 
Iran’s new supreme leader, still unseen since the war began, also vowed in his first statement since the funeral of his father, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, that Iranians would avenge his killing in the war’s opening strikes on Feb. 
28. 
Such revenge “is the will of our nation and must certainly be carried out,” Supreme Leader Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei said in a statement carried on state television. 
U.S. officials, speaking Friday on condition of anonymity about the current situation with Iran, said the resumption of strikes even before the latest round came as a result of what they described as a rogue faction of Iranian hard-liners who were trying to sabotage the ceasefire. 
Iran has insisted its theocracy is unified under the new supreme leader. 
After the U.S. wrapped up strikes on Thursday, more attacks reportedly hit Iran, raising questions about who else may be targeting the Islamic Republic. 
Israel didn’t claim them, meaning the Gulf Arab states may have launched them, likely as a means to deter Iran from attacking them again. 
Iran on Thursday retaliated for U.S. strikes by targeting Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait and Qatar. 
The strikes in Iran over two rounds of strikes last week killed at least 17 people and wounded 115 others, Iranian Health Ministry spokesperson Hossein Kermanpour said. 
Weissert reported from Washington. 
To comment, please create a screen name in 
verify your email address 
View the best photos of tall ships sailing into Boston Harbor 
How a chance encounter with a Scotland fan became a viral love story 
Sail Boston 2026: Updates from the tall ships 
3 New England hotels just ranked among the 100 best in the world 
Review & Setlist: Shakira delivers high-energy nostalgia and new beginnings at TD Garden 
US Sen. 
Lindsey Graham has died after a brief and unexpected illness, his office says 
Trump threatens Iran after Ayatollah’s funeral saw open calls for his killing 
US demands Iran publicly state that Strait of Hormuz is open and Tehran won’t attack ships anymore 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.4%Associated Press: 2.2%Boston.com: 2.2%Confirmation Bias7.4%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.8%Boston.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias2.6%This article: 1.8%Associated Press: 3.2%Boston.com: 3.0%Availability Heuristic1.8%This article: 2.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Boston.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Associated Press: 7.1%Boston.com: 5.7%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Boston.com: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.1%Boston.com: 2.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 1.6%Boston.com: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 17.0%Associated Press: 8.7%Boston.com: 6.2%Negativity Bias17.0%This article: 4.2%Associated Press: 2.0%Boston.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.8%Boston.com: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error2.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Associated Press: 1.0%Boston.com: 1.0%In-Group Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Boston.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.3%Boston.com: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.3%Associated Press: 1.4%Boston.com: 1.4%Recency Bias13.3%This article: 3.3%Associated Press: 0.3%Boston.com: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Boston.com: 0.3%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.9%Associated Press: 3.4%Boston.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority19.9%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Boston.com: 1.1%False Dilemma1.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.4%Slippery Slope2.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.4%Associated Press: 2.7%Boston.com: 3.1%Hasty Generalization8.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Boston.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%Associated Press: 4.7%Boston.com: 6.2%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 2.4%Associated Press: 0.6%Boston.com: 0.5%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 16.4%Associated Press: 2.2%Boston.com: 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.7%Associated Press: 0.5%Boston.com: 0.4%Burden of Proof8.7%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.7%Boston.com: 2.2%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.6%Associated Press: 1.2%Boston.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Boston.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Boston.com: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 10.0%Associated Press: 1.3%Boston.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote10.0%This article: 2.1%Associated Press: 1.1%Boston.com: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection2.1%This article: 8.1%Associated Press: 3.0%Boston.com: 3.8%Biased Writer Voice8.1%This article: 1.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Boston.com: 1.3%Indoctrination1.0%This article: 2.8%Associated Press: 0.8%Boston.com: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Boston.com: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Associated Press: 0.4%Boston.com: 2.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.2%

1138 words analyzed.

Speakers

15speakers29%attributed speech811writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 11 words • 100.0% coveragePete Hegseth • 3 words • 0.0% coverageMohammad Bagher Qalibaf • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMohammad Bagher Qalibaf • 11 words • 100.0% coverageMohammad Bagher Qalibaf • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMohammad Bagher Qalibaf • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageQatar’s military • 19 words • 0.0% coverageQatar’s Interior Ministry • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKuwait’s military • 9 words • 0.0% coverageOmani state news agency • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command • 6 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageUnited Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations center • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary Guard • 22 words • 0.0% coverageRevolutionary Guard • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageIranian state media • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageOman • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAyatollah Mojtaba Khamenei • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageHossein Kermanpour • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Iranian state media

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words9.8% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Iranian state media: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Iranian state media: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-11.2 ptsWriter: 11.2%Iranian state media: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -8.6 ptsWriter: 8.6%Iranian state media: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.