Speaker summary
⁠91%2 analyzed articles/videos48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ministry results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (9,445 of 28,364 speakers). This ministry is worse (more manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group.
ministry
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

67% percentile
025507510066.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 41.7%41.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 58.3%58.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 60.4%60.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 58.3%, sitewide 19.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos