Speaker summary
70% 7 analyzed articles/videos 885 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ming-Chi Kuo results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 281.912 hits . Analysis detected 1,655.517 faulty-reasoning hits from 885 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,631 of 28,364 speakers). This Ming-Chi Kuo is better (less manipulative) than 93.90% of the peer group. Ming-Chi Kuo
Speaker details
Total words: 885
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.1% percentile 7.3% BS Score7 analyzed videos885 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 29.3% 29.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 20.8% 20.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 17.7% 17.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 4.6% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst