Speaker summary
57%9 analyzed articles/videos577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike DeWine results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 47.9% saturation with 316.304 hits. Analysis detected 1,329.534 faulty-reasoning hits from 577 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (24,173 of 26,155 speakers). This Mike DeWine is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.6% percentile
8.2% BS Score9 analyzed videos577 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 47.9%47.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.0%10.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.9%5.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 47.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 4.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate