Speaker summary
⁠65%4 analyzed articles/videos620 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Lujan Grisham results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 245.188 hits. Analysis detected 1,804.795 faulty-reasoning hits from 620 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (24,446 of 26,891 speakers). This Michelle Lujan Grisham is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group.
Michelle Lujan Grisham

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751009.1% percentile
8.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos620 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 33.9%33.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 15.3%15.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 15.9%15.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.9%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Begging the Question: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos