Fox News87%

New Mexico governor demands federal reparations after accusing DEA of fueling state's fentanyl crisis 55%

By Greg Wehner0%

6/29/2026, 10:56:28 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.6% saturation with 304 hits. Analysis detected 1,960 faulty-reasoning hits from 768 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.4% and a BS Rank of 55% (9,200 of 20,408 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the article peer group.

New Mexico Gov. 
Michelle Lujan Grisham is demanding the federal government pay reparations after accusing the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) of allowing millions of fentanyl pills to flood her state during an undercover operation without notifying state or local officials. 
Calling the alleged operation "the most derelict, despicable act in my long career," Lujan Grisham said the fallout has forced New Mexico to pour more than $1.5 billion into law enforcement, behavioral health, addiction treatment and other public safety initiatives while battling overdose deaths and widespread addiction. 
"The DEA stood silently by and watched thousands of fentanyl pills get distributed with no arrests, no evidence, no notice that we know of anywhere else," Lujan Grisham said during a Monday news conference. 
"Someone must pay for the damage to this state, the public safety risks that will be shared by everyone here for a decade." 
Lujan Grisham said she wants the federal government to reimburse New Mexico for the money it has spent combating the fentanyl epidemic, including law enforcement operations, behavioral health services, addiction treatment, overdose prevention and other public safety initiatives. 
NEW MEXICO AG LAUNCHES CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION INTO DEA OVER ALLEGATIONS AGENTS LET FENTANYL FLOOD STATE 
She also called on Congress to prohibit similar DEA operations in the future, require the federal government to fully fund the costs imposed on states by such operations and hold the officials involved personally accountable. 
"I've had to do this since 2019 three times," Lujan Grisham said. 
"We're here again, and this one, in fact, I think is the most devastating." 
The Democratic governor compared the controversy to previous federal failures she said harmed New Mexico, including the federal response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the U.S. 
Forest Service's prescribed burns that sparked the state's largest wildfire. 
She noted the wildfire ultimately resulted in a multibillion-dollar federal liability settlement, arguing the DEA operation should lead to similar accountability. 
Lujan Grisham said her administration repeatedly asked both the Biden and Trump administrations for more federal resources to combat New Mexico's escalating fentanyl crisis, including additional DEA agents and coordinated enforcement efforts, but those requests went unanswered. 
"Everybody behind me and the Office of the Governor have been asking both administrations… to do more about public safety in the state of New Mexico," she said, adding that her administration held multiple meetings, sent multiple letters and requested additional resources and agents, yet "it's been remarkably silent." 
Lujan Grisham also urged lawmakers to require federal agencies to notify state and local officials before conducting similar operations, restore roughly $25 million in federal behavioral health and public safety funding she said has been cut and enact legislation preventing similar DEA tactics from being used in the future. 
Her remarks came days after New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez announced a criminal investigation into allegations that the DEA knowingly allowed hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills to reach New Mexico communities while agents pursued larger criminal investigations. 
The Associated Press previously reported that DEA agents repeatedly monitored, but did not seize, large fentanyl shipments between 2023 and 2025 while attempting to build broader criminal cases. 
Torrez said the investigation will examine potential legal remedies, including criminal prosecution, civil litigation and structural reforms intended to prevent similar conduct by DEA agents in the future. 
"The families who have lost children, siblings, and parents to fentanyl deserve the truth about what the federal government knew and what it failed to do," Torrez said in a statement. 
"If the DEA stood by while poison flooded our communities, that is not a bureaucratic failure," he continued. 
"It is a betrayal of the people it was sworn to protect." 
Torrez said his office "will pursue every legal avenue available to hold the responsible parties accountable and make certain this never happens again." 
On Monday, Lujan Grisham echoed Torrez's call for accountability, saying those who approved or oversaw the operation should face consequences. 
"I want the people who knew this distribution was occurring without notifying anyone and allowing it to occur over and over again held accountable," Lujan Grisham said. 
"My bet is many of those people are still in that DEA office." 
"I am so angry. 
This is an outrage," she added. 
"They should be accountable for the length of time it's going to take us to combat the scourge of addiction and fentanyl overdose deaths." 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
Fox News Digital has reached out to the DEA for comment on the matter. 
Fox News Digital's Mike Sinkewicz contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.2%Greg Wehner: 2.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias9.2%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.1%Greg Wehner: 3.0%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic16.1%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 1.1%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Greg Wehner: 3.2%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias4.8%This article: 12.0%Greg Wehner: 9.5%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect12.0%This article: 6.1%Greg Wehner: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion6.1%This article: 4.8%Greg Wehner: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Greg Wehner: 3.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias3.0%This article: 9.6%Greg Wehner: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias9.6%This article: 39.6%Greg Wehner: 7.1%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias39.6%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 1.7%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 1.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 3.2%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Greg Wehner: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias6.6%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.6%Greg Wehner: 4.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority3.6%This article: 4.6%Greg Wehner: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma4.6%This article: 3.0%Greg Wehner: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope3.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.3%Greg Wehner: 3.4%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization5.3%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Greg Wehner: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 29.8%Greg Wehner: 6.9%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion29.8%This article: 12.9%Greg Wehner: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question12.9%This article: 21.9%Greg Wehner: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)21.9%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.4%Greg Wehner: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof6.4%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.1%Greg Wehner: 1.3%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal6.1%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.0%Greg Wehner: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.1%Greg Wehner: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote6.1%This article: 6.4%Greg Wehner: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection6.4%This article: 21.1%Greg Wehner: 1.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice21.1%This article: 3.0%Greg Wehner: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination3.0%This article: 3.4%Greg Wehner: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Greg Wehner: 1.8%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Greg Wehner: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.0%

768 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers71%attributed speech221writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 47 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 34 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 23 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 35 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 49 words • 100.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 49 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRaúl Torrez • 28 words • 0.0% coverageRaúl Torrez • 31 words • 0.0% coverageRaúl Torrez • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRaúl Torrez • 12 words • 0.0% coverageRaúl Torrez • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMichelle Lujan Grisham • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageFox News Digital • 14 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
79%flagged-word coverage
412 attributed words75% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.6 ptsWriter: 29.9%Michelle Lujan Grisham: 23.3%23.3%Politically Left Leaning B-11.8 ptsWriter: 11.8%Michelle Lujan Grisham: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+11.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michelle Lujan Grisham: 11.4%11.4%Quote-first Misdirection+1.5 ptsWriter: 6.8%Michelle Lujan Grisham: 8.3%8.3%Indoctrination+5.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Michelle Lujan Grisham: 5.6%5.6%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Michelle Lujan Grisham: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.