Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fentanyl Crisis results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 1,027 hits. Analysis detected 9,573 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,565 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,115 of 16,558 topics). This Fentanyl Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group.
Fentanyl Crisis
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,565
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510051.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos