Speaker summary
78% 3 analyzed articles/videos 371.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melania Trump results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 138.842 hits . Analysis detected 862.197 faulty-reasoning hits from 371.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 9% (23,689 of 25,998 speakers). This Melania Trump is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. Melania Trump
Speaker details
Total words: 371.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 8.9% BS Score3 analyzed videos371.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 32.2% 32.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 20.9% 20.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.6% 14.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.9%, sitewide 6.0% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst