Speaker summary
⁠27%4 analyzed articles/videos198 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayo Clinic results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias and Overconfidence Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 217 faulty-reasoning hits from 198 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (21,567 of 27,791 speakers). This Mayo Clinic is better (less manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
Mayo Clinic
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 198
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510022.4% percentile
15.1% BS Score4 analyzed videos198 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.1%35.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos