Speaker summary
66% 6 analyzed articles/videos 687.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Dorsey results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Fundamental Attribution Error , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 192.519 hits . Analysis detected 1,688.428 faulty-reasoning hits from 687.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,849 of 28,364 speakers). This Matt Dorsey is better (less manipulative) than 94.70% of the peer group. Matt Dorsey
Speaker details
Total words: 687.667
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.3% percentile 6.9% BS Score6 analyzed videos687.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 21.2% 21.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 25.2% 25.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Straw Man: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst