OutKick89%

San Francisco lawmaker criticizes players 'cherry-picking' Bible quotes amid Giants controversy 21%

By Ryan Gaydos0%

6/16/2026, 10:21:33 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, False Dilemma, and Indoctrination, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 704 faulty-reasoning hits from 541 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,369 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the article peer group.

A San Francisco lawmaker criticized Giants players for writing Bible verses on their cap during the organization’s Pride Night as MLB warned the team about the messages on Monday. 
Matt Dorsey, a Democrat who represents District 6 and sits on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, wrote on social media the event was "disappointing in several respects." 
He authored a lengthy thread on X about the ordeal. 
"First, as a sports fan, it struck me as problematically undisciplined," he began. 
"When you’re a highly paid professional athlete, your uniform isn’t a canvas for individual self-expression  especially about politics  and it has been my observation over the years that championship-caliber teams never tolerate distractions like this. 
"Second, as a person of faith, I’ll be the first to defend Bible verses and prayer as sources of inspiration and strength for many athletes  I have no problem with that. 
But I am bothered to see Biblical cherry-picking used to score political points, on a single occasion, and it’s hard to argue this was anything other than that." 
Dorsey added that, as a gay man, he was "disappointed" that a symbol of the LGBTQ+ community was still seen as "controversial." 
"Major cities with major-league sports teams are inherently diverse, and if you’re uncomfortable celebrating the wide array of heritage and pride nights for communities that make up the city on your uniform, maybe the major leagues aren’t for you." 
Still, Dorsey didn’t think the players who wrote the Bible verses on their Pride Night cap were "bigoted." 
"All that being said, I refuse to call what these athletes did bigoted or hateful  and I would urge all those offended or hurt by this episode to show them grace. 
The LGBTQ+ equality movement succeeds when we commit to winning hearts and minds, rather than shaming them," he added. 
MLB warned Giants players about the Bible verses. 
"The writing on the cap violates our rules, and consistent with normal practice, we have warned the players about future violations," MLB’s chief communications officer Pat Courtney said in a statement, via The Athletic. 
San Francisco pitcher Landen Roupp wrote "Gen 9:12-16" on his cap over the weekend and was asked about the decision. 
"It's just about God's covenant and a promise that he makes to us that, you know, his faithfulness and his mercy," Roupp said to reporters. 
"That's just kind of something I believe in, and I stand firm in that, and I'm thankful we live in a country where, you know, we have the freedom to believe what we want ... and express what we want. 
"There's no hate at all. 
It’s just what I stand for, and what I stand in. 
I believe in God." 
Giants manager Tony Vitello also seemed to brush off the issue. 
"Not really. 
I mean, just kind of a general knowledge of the individuals have the freedom to do what they think is best," Vitello said. 
"But I do think it’s been apparent from day one, actually, even some of the exhibition games, it’s pretty impressive how the Giants, as an organization, try and embrace the entire community." 
Fox News’ Ian Miller contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.4%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 6.8%Ryan Gaydos: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 12.8%Ryan Gaydos: 7.3%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect12.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.3%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Ryan Gaydos: 1.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.9%This article: 12.6%Ryan Gaydos: 11.0%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias12.6%This article: 7.4%Ryan Gaydos: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Ryan Gaydos: 1.3%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Ryan Gaydos: 2.5%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Ryan Gaydos: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias1.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Ryan Gaydos: 3.7%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 12.4%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma12.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.8%Ryan Gaydos: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization6.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 7.5%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 5.2%Ryan Gaydos: 1.6%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question5.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 8.9%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature8.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.9%Ryan Gaydos: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal5.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.9%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.5%Ryan Gaydos: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground3.5%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.0%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.0%This article: 5.2%Ryan Gaydos: 4.5%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice5.2%This article: 9.4%Ryan Gaydos: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination9.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 0.4%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Gaydos: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

541 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers87%attributed speech71writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 39 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 32 words • 100.0% coverageMatt Dorsey • 19 words • 100.0% coverageMLB • 8 words • 0.0% coveragePat Courtney • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLanden Roupp • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLanden Roupp • 40 words • 0.0% coverageLanden Roupp • 5 words • 0.0% coverageLanden Roupp • 11 words • 0.0% coverageLanden Roupp • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageTony Vitello • 2 words • 0.0% coverageTony Vitello • 23 words • 0.0% coverageTony Vitello • 32 words • 0.0% coverageFox News’ Ian Miller • 8 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tony Vitello

96%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words12% of attributed speech72% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Quote-first Misdirection-15.5 ptsWriter: 15.5%Tony Vitello: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.