Keyword summary
61% 11 analyzed articles/videos 1,127 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco Giants results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 4,581 hits . Analysis detected 25,203 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,586 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,245 of 37,536 keywords). This San Francisco Giants is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. San Francisco Giants
Keyword details
Total words: 24,586
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score11 analyzed articles24.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst