Four arrests made after vicious fan brawl in Giants-Rockies game ⁠70%

By Ryan Kostecka⁠0%

7/11/2026, 12:47:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Overconfidence Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 60.9% saturation with 238 hits. Analysis detected 761 faulty-reasoning hits from 391 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,751 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the article peer group.

See more of our coverage in your search results. 
Add The California Post on Google 
Less than 24 hours after one of the most vicious fan brawls you’ll ever see broke out at the Giants-Rockies game, police have made four arrests. 
What began as a fight between two men — one in a black Oakland Raiders Khalil Mack jersey — quickly escalated into a full on brawl that featured multiple others, including two women throwing massive haymakers at one another. 
Four arrests were made by San Francisco police after a vicious fan brawl broke out Thursday night at Oracle Park during the Giants-Rockies game. 
Four arrests were made by San Francisco police after a vicious fan brawl broke out Thursday night at Oracle Park during the Giants-Rockies game. 
X/@Coach_Yac 
The brawl spilled from their seats in the stands down the left field line to the concourse alongside the field, where it was eventually broken up by other fans not involved. 
Multiple people were detained by police, but only four were booked into San Francisco County Jail. 
Of the four, one was charged with public intoxication and suspicion of assault. 
The other three were arrested on suspicion of public intoxication and disturbing the peace. 
The age range of those arrested were 21-29. 
While it’s impossible to tell who started the fight based on the multiple fan videos, the man in the black jersey was involved in nearly every aspect of the incident. 
There was a huge fight at the Giants – Rockies game last night 
via: @GiantHotTakes pic.twitter.com/8GoZ9xr2g3 
- Coach Yac 🗣 (@Coach_Yac) July 10, 2026 
After being seen pummeling a man on the ground, the man in the black jersey turned his attention to two women fighting. 
He was seen kicking one of the women on the ground multiple times after she was thrown down by another women. 
The man then, with the woman still on the ground, began to ruthlessly beat her with massive punches before eventually being pulled off by other spectators. 
Although the Giants beat the Rockies 8-2 Thursday night, they fell 4-3 Friday night. 
The ugly scene only added to what has already been a brutal season for the Giants, who have watched early expectations give way to injuries, offensive droughts and mounting frustration around the club. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.1%Ryan Kostecka: 0.6%California Post: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 1.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%Ryan Kostecka: 0.4%California Post: 4.2%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 2.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.4%California Post: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 14.3%Ryan Kostecka: 3.8%California Post: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias14.3%This article: 27.1%Ryan Kostecka: 4.5%California Post: 10.3%Framing Effect27.1%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.3%California Post: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 7.3%California Post: 2.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.4%Ryan Kostecka: 2.1%California Post: 1.5%Pessimism Bias8.4%This article: 60.9%Ryan Kostecka: 18.1%California Post: 16.0%Negativity Bias60.9%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Ryan Kostecka: 1.4%California Post: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error7.7%This article: 5.6%Ryan Kostecka: 0.3%California Post: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 1.0%California Post: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.8%California Post: 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 6.4%California Post: 3.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.2%Ryan Kostecka: 1.4%California Post: 1.6%Recency Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.4%California Post: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.8%Ryan Kostecka: 1.1%California Post: 4.2%Appeal to Authority0.8%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 1.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.6%Ryan Kostecka: 1.2%California Post: 5.5%Hasty Generalization6.6%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.3%California Post: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.4%Ryan Kostecka: 4.1%California Post: 8.9%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.4%Ryan Kostecka: 0.5%California Post: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.8%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.3%Ryan Kostecka: 0.2%California Post: 3.6%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.4%Ryan Kostecka: 1.0%California Post: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.4%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Ryan Kostecka: 0.3%California Post: 3.2%Unattributed Quote0.3%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.2%California Post: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 18.2%California Post: 13.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.3%California Post: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ryan Kostecka: 0.0%California Post: 3.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Ryan Kostecka: 0.7%California Post: 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.8%

391 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers2.8%attributed speech380writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage@GiantHotTakes • 3 words • 0.0% coverageCoach Yac • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

@GiantHotTakes

100%flagged-word coverage
3 attributed words27% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%@GiantHotTakes: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-0.3 ptsWriter: 0.3%@GiantHotTakes: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.