Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Vitello results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Nature, and Status Quo Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (17,344 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony Vitello is better (less manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group.
Tony Vitello
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

39% percentile
025507510038.9% percentile
24.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.1%28.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.2%20.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 2.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos