Speaker summary
44%3 analyzed articles/videos214.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Devoti results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with No True Scotsman as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 61 hits. Analysis detected 419.191 faulty-reasoning hits from 214.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.8% and a BS Rank of 13% (22,726 of 26,113 speakers). This Matt Devoti is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Matt Devoti

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
10.8% BS Score3 analyzed videos214.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.7%16.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%No True Scotsman: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate