Speaker summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos71.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Bernstein results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Slippery Slope, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 70.6% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 429.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 71.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 47.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (10,235 of 27,710 speakers). This Matt Bernstein is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Matt Bernstein
Speaker details
Total words: 71.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
47.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos71.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 79.4%79.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 58.7%58.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 70.6%70.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 54.4%54.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 29.4%29.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.9%30.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 29.4%29.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 79.4%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 70.6%, sitewide 19.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 58.7%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 54.4%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos