Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Christine Pagulayan results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Bandwagon , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 224 hits . Analysis detected 1,541 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,342 authors). This Christine Pagulayan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Christine Pagulayan
Author details
Total words: 2,020
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.1% 11.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.0% 7.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Bandwagon: Author 7.0%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Tu Quoque: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst