Speaker summary
81% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mandela Barnes results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 381 hits . Analysis detected 2,004.982 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,075 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 10% (25,672 of 28,364 speakers). This Mandela Barnes is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group. Mandela Barnes
Speaker details
Total words: 1,075
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.5% percentile 9.1% BS Score3 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 27.9% 27.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 26.7% 26.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 33.3% 33.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.7% 19.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 26.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst