Speaker summary
⁠73%5 analyzed articles/videos165.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madison Square Garden results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, False Dilemma, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44.8% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 808.232 faulty-reasoning hits from 165.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 21% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (18,770 of 28,364 speakers). This Madison Square Garden is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Madison Square Garden

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510033.8% percentile
21.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos165.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.8%44.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 13.2%13.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.8%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 29.4%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos