CBS News98%

5 people stabbed at New York City's Penn Station #shorts 93%

6/7/2026, 10:00:30 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36.9% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 592 faulty-reasoning hits from 176 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.2% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,714 of 21,887 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 92.20% of the video peer group.

Five people were stabbed at New York City's Penn Station Sunday night. 
Here's what we know so far. At least one of the victims has serious injuries and all five were taken to the hospital for further treatment. 
Police say the suspect is believed to be an emotionally disturbed individual with no terror links who attacked people at random. 
And this all comes a day before President Trump is expected to attend game three of the NBA finals at Madison Square Garden, which is directly above Penn Station. 
So, the area has already seen heightened security and collaboration between the NYPD and Secret Service. 
Madison Square Garden said that fans coming to Monday's game should expect to get there 2 hours before tip off to go through TSA style security. 
And those watch parties that we've seen outside of the arena for games one and two have been cancelled. 
As for tonight, police asked that people avoid the Penn Station area while they continue to investigate. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%CBS Miami: 0.6%Anchoring Bias6.8%This article: 15.9%CBS Miami: 2.5%Availability Heuristic15.9%This article: 11.9%CBS Miami: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic11.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%CBS Miami: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias14.8%This article: 36.9%CBS Miami: 6.1%Framing Effect36.9%This article: 10.8%CBS Miami: 0.3%Loss Aversion10.8%This article: 9.1%CBS Miami: 0.6%Status Quo Bias9.1%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 24.4%CBS Miami: 1.1%Pessimism Bias24.4%This article: 12.5%CBS Miami: 6.7%Negativity Bias12.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 22.7%CBS Miami: 1.1%Recency Bias22.7%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 36.4%CBS Miami: 4.3%Appeal to Authority36.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 9.1%CBS Miami: 0.1%Circular Reasoning9.1%This article: 11.9%CBS Miami: 2.5%Hasty Generalization11.9%This article: 16.5%CBS Miami: 0.1%Red Herring16.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 27.3%CBS Miami: 4.1%Appeal to Emotion27.3%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 16.5%CBS Miami: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)16.5%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 24.4%CBS Miami: 0.4%Burden of Proof24.4%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.8%CBS Miami: 1.2%Anecdotal10.8%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.9%CBS Miami: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.9%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.7%CBS Miami: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection5.7%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 1.5%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%CBS Miami: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

176 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers36%attributed speech112writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coveragePolice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMadison Square Garden • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coveragePolice • 17 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Police

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words59% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Quote-first Misdirection-8.9 ptsWriter: 8.9%Police: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.