Speaker summary
57% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,044.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Murrill results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 358 hits . Analysis detected 3,013.951 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,044.333 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,633 of 28,364 speakers). This Liz Murrill is better (less manipulative) than 97.40% of the peer group. Liz Murrill
Speaker details
Total words: 1,044.333
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.6% percentile 5.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 22.4% 22.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 20.7% 20.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 4.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst