Speaker summary
34% 4 analyzed articles/videos 378.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lewis Kaplan results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 134 hits . Analysis detected 481.636 faulty-reasoning hits from 378.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 6% (26,897 of 28,364 speakers). This Lewis Kaplan is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group. Lewis Kaplan
Speaker details
Total words: 378.667
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.2% percentile 6.8% BS Score4 analyzed videos378.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 19.3% 19.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 2.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst