Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Bekiempis results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Status Quo Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 140 hits. Analysis detected 872 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,834 of 6,364 authors). This Victoria Bekiempis is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Victoria Bekiempis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
24%Victoria Bekiempis (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,276
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

24% percentile
025507510024.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.8%2.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 0.6%0.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Straw Man: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.9%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos