Trump Suffers Third E. Jean Carroll Loss in 24 Hours 31%

By Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling58%

7/9/2026, 2:44:30 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 123 hits. Analysis detected 749 faulty-reasoning hits from 491 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.6% and a BS Rank of 31% (14,272 of 20,498 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the article peer group.

Trump Suffers Third E. 
Jean Carroll Loss in 24 Hours 
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied Donald Trump's emergency motion to temporarily suspend the court-ordered payment to E. 
Jean Carroll, who was found civilly liable for sexually assaulting her in 1995. 
Despite Trump's legal team's efforts to appeal the case to the Supreme Court, the nation's highest judiciary ultimately rejected the request, leading to the release of $5 million in court-held funds to Carroll. 
Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered Trump to pay Carroll, stating that it was time for him to "do equity" and settle the judgment, as Trump had been stalling the case for years. 
Donald Trump is absolutely, finally, paying E. 
Jean Carroll. 
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied the president's emergency motion to temporarily suspend the court-ordered payment late Wednesday. 
The decision came shortly after Judge Lewis Kaplan ordered the release of $5 million in court-held funds to the beleaguered columnist, more than three years after Trump was found civilly liable for sexually assaulting Carroll in a department store in late 1995. 
The last-minute stay was a Hail Mary thrown by Trump's legal team, who had tried to appeal the case to the Supreme Court earlier this week. 
But the nation's highest judiciary ultimately rejected the request on Tuesday. 
Despite the high court's decision, Trump's legal team wrote to Kaplan asking him not to release the funds, claiming that the president's Supreme Court petition for a new hearing was still pending. 
By Wednesday morning, the SCOTUS docket had been updated to reflect that it was anticipating a corrected petition from the president's team. 
But hours later, it appeared that Kaplan had gone ahead and ordered the release of the funds to Carroll despite Trump's pending filing, anyway. 
In a six-page memorandum penned Wednesday, Kaplan noted that Trump "has been stalling this case for years." 
"It is time for him to 'do equity' and pay the judgment," Kaplan ordered. 
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals clearly agreed. 
Carroll has a long and grim history with the president. 
After the 2023 civil case, Trump tried and failed to sue Carroll for defamation. 
Kaplan later ruled that Trump had continued to defame the advice columnist by denying the rape on the basis that she wasn't his "type," and by accusing her of making up the sexual assault allegations against him for the benefit of her book. 
A jury awarded Carroll $83.3 million in that case, though Carroll has not yet seen any proceeds from that decision, either. 
Late last month, Carroll's attorney Roberta Kaplan (no relation to the New York–based judge) asked a judge to implement an expedited payment schedule for the sum that Trump owes Carroll, noting that by this point, the president owes Carroll interest on the original amount. 
"It is time for this case to come to an end," Carroll's attorney wrote in a Tuesday legal filing. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.2%Associated Press: 2.1%Confirmation Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%Associated Press: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.8%Associated Press: 2.9%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.1%Associated Press: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.9%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%Associated Press: 0.4%Hindsight Bias4.9%This article: 1.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.2%Associated Press: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias1.6%This article: 22.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 9.5%Associated Press: 5.4%Framing Effect22.0%This article: 4.3%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.9%Loss Aversion4.3%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.6%Associated Press: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 21.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.5%Associated Press: 7.4%Negativity Bias21.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.3%Associated Press: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 25.1%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.7%Associated Press: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error25.1%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.8%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.8%Associated Press: 4.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.6%Associated Press: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%Associated Press: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 4.1%Associated Press: 4.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.0%Associated Press: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.7%Associated Press: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 5.2%Associated Press: 3.3%Hasty Generalization1.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.4%Associated Press: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.4%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.0%Associated Press: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion9.4%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%Associated Press: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.3%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 3.9%Associated Press: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.3%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.8%Associated Press: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.4%Associated Press: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.3%Associated Press: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.3%Associated Press: 1.9%Anecdotal2.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.8%Associated Press: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.1%Associated Press: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.8%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.8%Unattributed Quote9.8%This article: 1.6%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 2.0%Associated Press: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 12.8%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 17.4%Associated Press: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice12.8%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%Associated Press: 1.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 8.8%Associated Press: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 1.2%Associated Press: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling: 0.5%Associated Press: 3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

491 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers42%attributed speech285writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageSecond Circuit Court of Appeals • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Kaplan • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSecond Circuit Court of Appeals • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Kaplan • 17 words • 100.0% coverageLewis Kaplan • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLewis Kaplan • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 44 words • 0.0% coverageRoberta Kaplan • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lewis Kaplan

87%flagged-word coverage
105 attributed words51% of attributed speech87% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Unattributed Quote+45.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Lewis Kaplan: 45.7%45.7%Biased Writer Voice-22.1 ptsWriter: 22.1%Lewis Kaplan: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.8 ptsWriter: 2.8%Lewis Kaplan: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.