Speaker summary
50% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,388.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Chan results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 531.068 hits . Analysis detected 1,574.523 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,388.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,457 of 28,364 speakers). This Kyle Chan is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Kyle Chan
Speaker details
Total words: 1,388.667
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 5.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst