Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 6,687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These R. David Edelman results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 3,506 hits . Analysis detected 15,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,061 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,716 of 6,348 authors). This R. David Edelman is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group. R. David Edelman
Author details
Total words: 20,061
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.5% 17.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst