Speaker summary
42%11 analyzed articles/videos139.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KUER results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Optimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 28.4% saturation with 57.715 hits. Analysis detected 290.715 faulty-reasoning hits from 139.667 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (23,086 of 26,164 speakers). This KUER is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.8% percentile
10.3% BS Score11 analyzed videos139.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.7%12.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.6%15.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate