KUER0%

Utah cases are slowing, but measles isn’t done with us yet, says health expert 34%

By Martha Harris0%

5/27/2026, 9:07:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 1,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 656 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,516 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the article peer group.

While Utah’s measles cases appear to be slowing, infectious diseases expert Dr. 
Andrew Pavia said the state and broader United States should anticipate more outbreaks in the future. 
“Until we can restore faith in vaccines, restore funding for our public health agencies and increase measles vaccine coverage, we have to anticipate that there will be many more outbreaks,” Pavia said. 
“And some of these may blow up into very large conflagrations.” 
Pavia, chief of the University of Utah’s Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, spoke at a briefing titled “Measles: Is the United States Adapting to a New Reality?” 
hosted by The Infectious Diseases Society of America. 
Utah’s current outbreak started in a remote community that straddles the border with Arizona, but has since spread statewide. 
According to the latest numbers from the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, there have been 673 confirmed measles cases since last summer  476 of which were this year alone. 
Utah’s new cases per week peaked in March, reaching into the 50s. 
In the last few weeks, there have been fewer than 10 new cases each week. 
Every couple of weeks, Pavia said he’s on a call with other Utah doctors and the state health department to talk about a variety of infectious diseases. 
When they talk about measles, the common refrain is “this isn't over yet.” 
“Because we still have pockets of very low immunization,” Pavia said. 
“Any place  you know, whether it's Utah or a state that hasn't yet experienced bad measles  that you have these pockets of low immunization rates, you're at risk.” 
He compared outbreaks to wildfires, where the fuel is unvaccinated people. 
If more than 95% of people are vaccinated, also known as herd immunity, Pavia said, there’s not enough fuel. 
Next, he said there needs to be a spark, or a case of measles brought in from another community. 
“When that spark hits, you do have a limited amount of time to contain it before it spreads, similar to a wildfire.” 
Measles is a highly contagious disease, he said, “many times more contagious than COVID, Ebola or hantavirus.” 
Pavia will be watching what happens this summer to see if cases flare up again with large gatherings around the holidays. 
Even if things are calm in the coming months, in the fall, it just takes one spark in a school with high vaccine-exemption rates for another outbreak to occur. 
“We are going to stay on high alert,” Pavia said. 
“Hopefully we're going to get a break here for a couple of months.” 
Measles has officially been declared eliminated in the U.S. since 2000. 
An international panel is expected to review it this fall, and Pavia said he strongly believes the U.S. will lose that elimination status. 
“We’ve been lucky for the past several decades that we've been protected by very high vaccination rates,” he said. 
“But that's no longer true here in the U.S., and in many other countries.” 
Still, he has hope for the future. 
He said he trusts parents and the American public to eventually realize they’ve “gone down an unfortunate path in the interest of doing what they think might be right.” 
“I don't think we should accept it as the long-term new normal,” Pavia told KUER after the panel. 
Reestablishing trust in vaccines and strengthening public health can’t happen overnight, Pavia said. 
And he doesn’t think it will happen “until we have more effective leadership at the top.” 
Because of that, he thinks the United States will face ongoing measles challenges for the next several years. 
“If you look at the conditions that it takes to have a large outbreak, they exist in many states,” he said. 
“I don't think measles is done with us.” 
Editor’s note: KUER is a licensee of the University of Utah but operates as an editorially independent news organization. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.9%Martha Harris: 2.7%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Martha Harris: 3.6%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic7.0%This article: 4.9%Martha Harris: 0.7%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Martha Harris: 2.0%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias2.9%This article: 3.5%Martha Harris: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect3.5%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.8%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.4%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.0%Martha Harris: 2.7%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias3.0%This article: 18.0%Martha Harris: 2.4%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias18.0%This article: 8.7%Martha Harris: 5.9%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias8.7%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.4%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error5.3%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias4.4%This article: 2.1%Martha Harris: 0.5%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.7%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.8%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.5%Martha Harris: 3.9%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority12.5%This article: 4.9%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma4.9%This article: 7.2%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope7.2%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.9%Martha Harris: 3.5%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization9.9%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.0%Martha Harris: 1.2%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon2.0%This article: 8.8%Martha Harris: 5.6%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 2.4%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 6.1%Martha Harris: 1.6%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 4.4%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque4.4%This article: 2.7%Martha Harris: 0.4%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.7%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.9%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division2.9%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 1.5%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.6%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.6%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.4%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.2%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.4%Martha Harris: 1.0%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote2.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.9%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.1%Martha Harris: 2.1%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 4.4%Martha Harris: 1.1%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.1%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Martha Harris: 0.6%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

656 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers74%attributed speech170writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 16 words • 100.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageThe Infectious Diseases Society of America • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageUtah Department of Health and Human Services • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 29 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 29 words • 100.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAndrew Pavia • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Andrew Pavia

94%flagged-word coverage
446 attributed words92% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-15.9 ptsWriter: 15.9%Andrew Pavia: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+6.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Andrew Pavia: 6.5%6.5%Unattributed Quote+3.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Andrew Pavia: 3.6%3.6%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.