Speaker summary
⁠55%2 analyzed articles/videos1,072 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Pavia results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 238.331 hits. Analysis detected 2,124.205 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,072 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠3% (27,746 of 28,364 speakers). This Andrew Pavia is better (less manipulative) than 97.80% of the peer group.
Andrew Pavia
Speaker details
Total words: 1,072
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751002.2% percentile
4.7% BS Score2 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 20.1%20.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.4%9.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 15.9%15.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.9%10.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos