Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KUER 90.1 results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 26.3% saturation with 2,428 hits . Analysis detected 7,612 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,224 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,692 of 6,170 authors). This KUER 90.1 is better (less manipulative) than 59.80% of the peer group. KUER 90.1
Author details
Total words: 9,224
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 26.3% 26.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 26.3%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst