KUER⁠0%

July 16 - KUER Pint Night: SaltFire Brewing ⁠45%

By KUER 90.1⁠0%

6/30/2026, 5:51:52 PM

Topics: Events

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 165 faulty-reasoning hits from 121 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 47.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (11,406 of 20,444 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the article peer group.

On Thursday, July 16, KUER is taking over SaltFire Brewing in Salt Lake City for Pint Night — 6 to 9 p.m. 
Stop by, meet Midday Host Bob Nelson, "RadioWest" producer Tim Slover and other KUER staff. 
SaltFire Brewing is pouring $4 draft beers all night. 
And for a $20 donation, you can snag an exclusive pint glass marking KUER's 65th anniversary. 
This custom KUER pint glass is only available in person at Pint Night. 
Come for the drinks. 
Stay for the conversation. 
Support local journalism while you're at it. 
Summer Pint Night: SaltFire Brewing 
Thursday, July 16 | 6-9 p.m. 
NOTE: This venue is 21+ 
2199 S W Temple, Salt Lake City 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.3%KUER: 2.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.5%KUER: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 4.7%KUER: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.2%KUER: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.3%KUER: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.5%KUER: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 50.4%KUER 90.1: 5.8%KUER: 7.4%Framing Effect50.4%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.7%KUER: 1.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.4%KUER: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 3.0%KUER: 4.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.9%KUER: 2.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 2.5%KUER: 6.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.6%KUER: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.2%KUER: 1.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.0%KUER: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 2.5%KUER: 2.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.3%KUER: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.9%KUER: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.1%KUER: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 2.7%KUER: 4.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.9%KUER: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.2%KUER: 4.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.8%KUER 90.1: 2.4%KUER: 5.6%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.2%KUER: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.1%KUER: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.3%KUER: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.5%KUER: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 3.9%KUER: 3.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 1.0%KUER: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.3%KUER: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.6%KUER: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.6%KUER: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 18.2%KUER 90.1: 6.4%KUER: 2.2%Biased Writer Voice18.2%This article: 5.8%KUER 90.1: 3.8%KUER: 1.6%Indoctrination5.8%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.0%KUER: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%KUER 90.1: 0.2%KUER: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 56.2%KUER 90.1: 26.3%KUER: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…56.2%

121 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.