Speaker summary
73% 5 analyzed articles/videos 256.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kris Mayes results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 76.3% saturation with 223.414 hits . Analysis detected 1,206.692 faulty-reasoning hits from 256.667 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 24% and a BS Rank of 39% (17,409 of 28,364 speakers). This Kris Mayes is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Kris Mayes
Speaker details
Total words: 256.667
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 24.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos256.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 76.3% 76.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 72.9% 72.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 35.1% 35.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 23.4% 23.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 23.4% 23.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.2% 23.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 35.1% 35.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 76.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 72.9%, sitewide 19.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect: Speaker 35.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.2%, sitewide 8.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst