Author summary
5%1 analyzed article/video1,832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brian Dolinar results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 367 hits. Analysis detected 2,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,147 of 6,244 authors). This Brian Dolinar is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group.
Brian Dolinar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
18%Brian Dolinar (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,496
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510017.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.4%1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos