Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaughn Jacobson results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,924 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,342 of 6,628 authors). This Vaughn Jacobson is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Vaughn Jacobson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
65%Vaughn Jacobson (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,924
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos