Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katherine Clark (D-MA) results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 51.9% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 140 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (13,999 of 28,187 speakers). This Katherine Clark (D-MA) is worse (more manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Katherine Clark (D-MA)
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510050.3% percentile
32.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 48.1%48.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 31.5%31.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 27.8%27.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.5%31.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.4%20.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.4%20.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 48.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 31.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 27.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos