Speaker summary
⁠74%4 analyzed articles/videos106.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karl Urban results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 97.9% saturation with 101.833 hits. Analysis detected 193.833 faulty-reasoning hits from 106.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,558 of 28,364 speakers). This Karl Urban is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Karl Urban
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 106.333
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
41.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos106.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 97.9%97.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.7%25.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 16.2%16.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Halo Effect: Speaker 97.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 5.2%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos