Speaker summary
38% 5 analyzed articles/videos 256 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Josh Hart results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Quote-first Misdirection , and Ad Hominem , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 46 hits . Analysis detected 324.799 faulty-reasoning hits from 256 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,490 of 28,364 speakers). This Josh Hart is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. Josh Hart
Speaker details
Total words: 256
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 5.4% BS Score5 analyzed videos256 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 3.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst