Speaker summary
⁠67%4 analyzed articles/videos318 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Geevarghese results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, In-Group Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.3% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 807.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 318 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (26,007 of 28,364 speakers). This Joseph Geevarghese is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Joseph Geevarghese

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
8.5% BS Score4 analyzed videos318 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.8%12.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.9%15.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 18.1%18.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 9.0%9.0%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.4%5.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.1%No True Scotsman: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Primacy Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos