Speaker summary
41% 8 analyzed articles/videos 370.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Solomon results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Overconfidence Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 130 hits . Analysis detected 859.133 faulty-reasoning hits from 370.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,197 of 28,364 speakers). This John Solomon is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. John Solomon
Speaker details
Total words: 370.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 6.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos370.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 16.5% 16.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.2% 17.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 11.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst