Speaker summary
41%8 analyzed articles/videos370.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Solomon results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Overconfidence Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 859.133 faulty-reasoning hits from 370.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,197 of 28,364 speakers). This John Solomon is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

4% percentile
02550751004.1% percentile
6.2% BS Score8 analyzed videos370.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.5%16.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.5%15.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.7%11.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 11.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.5%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate