Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bob Unruh results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 542 hits. Analysis detected 3,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,826 of 6,215 authors). This Bob Unruh is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Bob Unruh
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
71%Bob Unruh (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,192
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.9%9.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.8%1.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.2%6.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.6%4.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 6.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Straw Man: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos