Speaker summary
⁠39%4 analyzed articles/videos1,636 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Brennan results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,962.362 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,636 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,268 of 28,364 speakers). This Joel Brennan is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Joel Brennan
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.0%7.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos