Speaker summary
44% 8 analyzed articles/videos 514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Morelle results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Status Quo Bias , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 77.366 hits . Analysis detected 550.028 faulty-reasoning hits from 514 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (28,035 of 28,364 speakers). This Joe Morelle is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. Joe Morelle
Speaker details
Total words: 514
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score8 analyzed videos514 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst