Speaker summary
⁠76%2 analyzed articles/videos104.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremy Carl results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 63.7% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 794.418 faulty-reasoning hits from 104.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 57% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,434 of 28,364 speakers). This Jeremy Carl is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Jeremy Carl
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 104.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
57.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos104.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 86.3%86.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 86.3%86.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 68.1%68.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 63.7%63.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 63.7%63.7%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 36.3%36.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 36.3%36.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 86.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 86.3%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 68.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 63.7%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 63.7%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 36.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos