Speaker summary
69%6 analyzed articles/videos203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasem Mohamed al-Budaiwi results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 346.479 faulty-reasoning hits from 203 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (19,179 of 28,364 speakers). This Jasem Mohamed al-Budaiwi is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

32% percentile
025507510032.4% percentile
20.2% BS Score6 analyzed videos203 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 46.5%46.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 38.4%38.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.3%26.3%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.7%8.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.0%9.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 46.5%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 38.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 6.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate